Tuesday, 30 December 2008
- No changes in Zuda's last rankings. If things are as close as they say, it could be any of the top three winning even though the zombie comic, Aeon of the Dead remained in 1st place.
- I'm drawing a really strange and wide variety of things right now; a Swords and Sorcery anti-hero, an anthropomorphic hero sandwich, an old-style football player, ALIENS-style gritty space marines, lovecraftian space colonists and superheroes.
- I'm casting about for what I would consider doing as a Zuda strip. I'm thinking about this within the context of how the process works; 8-page beginning followed by 52 weekly installments. It would have to be something best digested in 1-page increments and be fully wrapped up in the 60 total "screens". I find I'm thinking that typical web comics aren't the model to run with here and that I want to make a "promise" with the first 8 pages that will pay off by the end. I'm looking at what would make for a great three-issue series, essentially, but the first act ends at page 8.
- I've decided I have to make some room in my studio. I moved into a smaller space over a year ago and I've found that my original art collection has essentially been buried in storage ever since. I'd rather someone who'd have the artwork out and enjoy it have the pages, so I'm winnowing the collection a bit. For those interested in some great Garcia Lopez or Chris Bachalo pages take a look here. I'm trying to decide on the best way to store and care for the artwork I'm not selling, which might result in more auctions later.
- I start teaching in a little over a week at Durham College. Just the one class one day a week, but it'll feel good to be actively teaching again.
- In addition to the real basic drawing exercises I've started doing, I'm thinking a more advanced series of entries might be a good idea, time permitting. Right now I'm thinking about some basic anatomy tips, skipping around the body at whim, or something more like an online teaching resource for a readily available book or e-book. The front runners for the latter would either be George Bridgman's books (either in the smaller Dover editions or the complete book) or Andrew Loomis's Figure Drawing For All It's Worth. Figure Drawing is out of print in English, but there are a number of sites with it available as a free PDF download. Let me know what you guys would prefer.
Like many, I wish someone would put all of the man's books back in print.
- When I started this blog, the first picture was a zombie Baby New Year, I managed to draw another zombie early last January. That close enough to some sort of tradition for me! So I'm gonna try to make the first post of the new year a zombie for as long as I keep blogging.
Time to go draw!
Sunday, 28 December 2008
Saturday, 27 December 2008
When drawing the squares, make an effort to keep the lines lighter as they're really guidelines for the circle drawing. Take the time to get the squares right; you may want to draw just the squares then go back and draw the circles afterwards instead of drawing a square then popping a circle inside then drawing another square. You should be drawing consistently good squares at this point as wobbly shapes or rectangles don't allow you to make good circles.
Break the squares into bite-sized portions when starting (dividing the square into quarters as demonstrated in exercise #1 is perfectly okay to start, but you do want to move towards drawing without too many guides). Lightly indicate the curved arc moving from one side to another then continue into the next quadrant. If you're working on a table, feel free to rotate your sketchbook as you go. If the circle seems to wander into diamond-shape territory you can lightly draw in the corner-to-corner diagonals and measure a half-inch from the centre and make a tick-mark. The circle is an inch in diameter no matter what point you slice it in half, so this gives you another guide to work with until you're comfortable with the circle.
A circle is essentially a sphere without any depth added. When we get around to perspective we'll discuss how to draw those oval "ellipses" accurately, but, I think it's important to show where any exercise leads to later on. Since a circle sits exactly inside a square, it's not a great leap to understanding that a sphere fits inside a cube in the same way.
Thursday, 25 December 2008
Sunday, 21 December 2008
Saturday, 20 December 2008
1. Aeon of the Dead -
3. The Accountants -
4. Hellbreak -
5. Tri-Boro Tales -
6. A Single Soul -
7. Non-Exertus 12 -
8. Angus Frump Kills Christmas -
9. Caztar -
10. Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever -
Found out a few things since I last updated; you can change your vote and apparently the view count has no relationship to votes either. The December 11 rank update (I didn't blog about that update), mentioned that the top half a very close race. This essentially means that you can't use any of the external measures (favourites, views, or ratings) to get an idea of what is leading or developing momentum.
It could very well be that any significant movement at this late point could really be from people waffling and changing their votes to a higher placing strip they like -- theír second or third choices.
I'm interested to see that the entries I reviewed as being my 7th, 8th and 3rd "favourites" are in 1st, 2nd and 3rd. I changed my vote to HellBreak, and hoping that the race is close enough that they can make a late game come-back.
Friday, 19 December 2008
For one week spend at least ten to fifteen minutes a day drawing 1 inch squares in rows. Draw them as accurately as you can and make the rows as straight as you can. It's doesn't matter whether you draw them all at once or scattered across the day (though they do get easier as you go). I tried to keep them about a quarter-inch apart (I think the alleys between the squares help). You can draw the first one with a ruler to make it easier to draw the rest. I measured the first one I drew, but freehanded all of them. Now, I rarely try to get any line in one go; I usually lightly indicate where I think the line should be with the faintest of lines then make a stronger, darker line when I'm comfortable with the size, straightness and length of the line I'm going to draw.
I'm sure there are artists out there who can do this without the wobbles and rough edges you can see in my boxes. I'm also pretty sure some of you may struggle with this exercise, but it should develop your hand-eye coordination as well as some simple spacial analysis. While I think that's worthy enough for freehand squares to be an exercise, being able to draw squares with some degree of accuracy is very useful for drawing the figure and perspective from imagination.
It's pretty simple geometry, but rectangles and squares can be easily divided into halves, quarters, and thirds without having to recall too much math. Perspective drawing, which is really the bread and butter of imaginative drawing, really comes alive if you can take simple blocks and divide them into smaller sections, but I'm getting ahead of myself on that.
The downside to getting that head accurately in perspective is that Bridgman's head is really an intentional simplification, as you can see when I drop a square (rectangle, actually, since the head isn't anywhere near square) over a human skull.
Now, there is a great deal of skull-shape variation within ethnic types so the way a head would fit in a square could change quite a bit as you cross the globe, but, as will most things in drawing you have to start somewhere!
The great Andrew Loomis also built his standard head within a square. As you can see he placed things with more complex planning.
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
That gets easier when you do it for a living, perhaps too easy, so let me rephrase that slightly:
I believe in drawing for myself every day.
To a great number of people that might seem like a pointless distinction, so I should explain it. When you draw for a living the drawing is a means to an end. The goal is to give the client what they need to the best of your ability within the time allotted. This often will mean you’ll be working well within your established parameters of ability and knowledge and you won’t be expanding your capabilities as an artist. You will get better at doing what you already know how to do, and that will certainly seem like growth for some time. Dave Sim described the path for the comics artist as learning to draw well then learning to draw quickly then, finally, learning to draw well quickly. There’s a great deal of truth in this and I know I certainly experienced it. However, the trap for the working artist is that often the gratification of meeting the deadline and getting paid replaces the euphoria of drawing better than you did last month or last year.
Grab a pile of comics by a regularly working artist from across the length of his or her career. At the early issues you’ll see struggles with both storytelling and drawing, which will eventually settle down into competence and confidence. Many stagnate there. Some leave comics for growth opportunities in related fields; storyboarding, concept art, illustration and other tasks. Others might continue to push, their drawing and/or storytelling gets better, more visually compelling. The latter is the more difficult path as you have to push through both your expectations of your work and of the medium while doing so. As an art student you really only had the one goal; get good enough to get hired. As a professional it seems that most work to the level where they want to get good enough to not be out of work. They stop developing. I can think of a number of journeyman artists who’ve been essentially drawing at the same plateau for years, month after month of the same flaws or using the same shortcuts to cover up the same flaws.
There’s no external need to eliminate the flaws as long as they’re not stopping you from working, is there? If working for someone else was always the goal, that’s perfectly fine. However, I’d argue that no one chose to draw for a living to just get good enough. I think that every successful artist and art student I’ve met chose art as a career because they loved to draw at some point. For many, unfortunately, that love turns to obligation and becomes a job like most others, but with the benefit of it being indoor work with no heavy lifting. Oh, and you can work all day in your pajamas if you like. Perks galore!
There is a way to keep from losing that loving feeling; start drawing for you.
One of the things that just flabbergasted me when I started teaching life drawing was the instructions and expectations for students’ sketchbooks: students were to draw a minimum of 20 minutes a day but all the drawing within was to be strictly limited to life drawing derived exercises or studies from life. I really cannot stress enough how bad a decision that was.
All the students I was teaching were hoping for careers where imaginative drawing is the core skill. The ability to draw well without a model or to draw things that no longer or never existed is the backbone of animation, comics, and concept art. Not allowing the students’ imaginations to have play within their own sketchbooks is a certain method to turn love into resentment. I made a point of allowing imaginative drawing in the books and often provided more feedback on those works than the Nicolaides or Hale exercises. I realized that it was more likely I’d see improvement from the exercises if I could show a direct connection between the traditional studies and how they approach their own drawing. The students really responded well to this. I know I’m bragging, but my life drawing classes killed more trees with their sketchbook production than the other first year classes and I really feel they just drew better overall by the end of the year.
The school was started by someone who never worked in any of the fields taught within its walls. Having myself worked with animators, comic book artists and concept artists I know the grimly serious approach to art in the school was woefully inappropriate to actual work environments. You can work hard and learn while having a good time.
If you’re still a student you have to remember that all the drawing you do is for you.
Which brings me back to sketchbooks; the easiest way to maintain the idea of drawing for yourself is to have something entirely about drawing for yourself that you can carry with you and use whenever you a few spare minutes. It can be a developmental tool, an idea journal, a therapist, a notepad, whatever you want it to be at the moment it can be that. The key point is that you have to be able to take it with you. If you plan to draw for yourself an hour a day, it’s a great deal easier to do it in 5-10 minute increments over the course of the day than to try and find the time to do it all in one go. Buy a book that’s easy to carry and make sure you always have a couple of pencils and pens with you. I usually travel with a book bag, so an 8.5 x 11” black hardcover book is easy to always have with me. I also have a few really small books – I just posted about the wee Moleskine I’ve started carrying – it fits nicely in my breast pocket with a pen and pencil. If I’m out and I realize I have nothing to draw with or on I feel strange. I don’t feel naked, that’d be creepy, just like I forgot my keys or left a kettle on – that sort of thing.
Over the next while I’ll be handing out some developmental exercises for those interested in trying them. The idea will be to do them every day for 15 minutes in addition to drawing whatever you want to draw however you’d like to draw for up to an hour total per day. We’re trying to develop a sketchbook addiction, here, so 25 minutes a day is better than an hour every two days.
Monday, 15 December 2008
I’ve been thinking a great deal about drawing instruction again – not necessarily as it applies just too drawing comics, but how drawing instruction in my experience is usually handled overall.
While I am teaching again this spring, I’m not teaching drawing. So, to sate that part of me that needs to pass along that sort of knowledge, I think I’m going to use this blog as an outlet. While I bet I’d get a great deal more interest showing people how I draw hot babes or monsters, it wouldn’t be playing to my interests as much (though I am interested in drawing hot babes and monsters). I really want to deal with some of the key things that I believe can make people draw better.
Most courses and books start out by giving the aspiring artist something to draw; a geometric shape, a model, a still life or, should the teacher be an idiot, a photo. These kids are asked to go from zero-to-sixty in the first lesson and most instructors are too far developed in their own experience to really understand how many developmental steps they may be skipping. As important as observational drawing is the historic methods haven’t really been reconsidered for some time.
Really, what are the required developed skills to do good observational drawing?
Hand-eye coordination – being able to get your hand to make the marks where you want them on the drawing surface. This deals with one of the first abstractions of drawing: reducing the three-dimensional to two dimensions.
Spacial analysis – the ability to see the relationships of various parts of the subject either by distance or differing angles.
Line control – once you’re making the marks where you want them you have to be dealing with one of the illusions you have to create when representing three-dimensional objects on a two-dimensional surface. Your line can indicate texture, volume, weight, depth, and value.
I’m going to stop right there. it's enough to start with.
The first drawing class typically asks the student to incorporate two things that aren’t taught (hand-eye coordination and line control) as a part of the process to achieve a third that’s already quite difficult to learn. I can hear some of my former teachers voices in my head; you learn them all at once by doing them all at once. I believe that sort of educational philosophy is completely out of step with how we’re currently teaching today’s kids to learn. The teachers defending 70-year old teaching methodologies like Nicolaides’s archaic The Natural Way to Draw with their dying breaths should really just hurry up and die already. A new century calls for new methods to educate built upon the successes of previous methods. Bridgman, Loomis, Reilly, Hale, and even Nicolaides have all added great things to the arsenal of both the drawing student and instructor, but their works are several decades old and often exist independantly of each other. Looking at the educational work from artist instructors like Ron Lemen and others tells me that pushing old knowledge forward into new developmental tools is the way to go.
Now, if you ask any of my former students they know I’m possibly the biggest advocate for an artist keeping a sketchbook, so my first reflex to develop learning tools will involve daily use of a cheap black hardcover book. I’m also a booster for aggregate teaching methods; show the student something, make sure they understand it and can work with it then show something to add to it. Lessons develop slowly, but the gradually increasing complexity has a similar effect to resistance training with weights. You may not be able to bench press 200 pounds the first time you enter the gym, but by continually and gradually increasing the weight you can press you eventually reach the 200 pound target and surpass it.
So, the goal isn’t for the student to gain immediate hand-eye coordination, but to start developing it. As that hand-eye coordination grows we ask the student to start seeing special relationships. Once the student is utilizing both hand-eye coordination and demonstrating a growing facility with seeing angles and distances they are tasked with controlling the marks they make both in weight, thickness and flow.
Over the next few weeks I’m going to create three sketchbook exercises that will help anyone interested in following along develop towards drawing better. The goal will be 15-30 minutes of sketchbook work a day. A week, perhaps two should be enough to get comfortable with the core concept of the exercise and allow the addition of the second exercise to the process, followed by the third.
First up, though, I believe I’ll have to discuss the importance of keeping a daily sketchbook.
Sunday, 14 December 2008
Well, right off, the elastic band to close the book, the bookmark ribbon and rear endpaper pocket are neat to have, but haven't been perks yet. The paper is weirdly thick; like 1-ply smooth cream-coloured bristol board. Now, I like drawing on smooth bristol, so this is a plus.
Decided the book would be entirely goofball stuff out of my head, thus Tubby Peepers shows up on the "address and reward" page. In a moment of paranoia I Pshopped the address and reward out. . . .
The strange thing about the book, to me anyway, is that I never draw on small paper. I often doodle a fair bit and some of those doodles are quite small, but it's always on 8.5x11" paper or larger, so getting a feel for this tiny book is job #1, I guess.
Maybe because somewhere in the back of my head I'm thinking about how this little book is probably has the highest price to drawing surface ratio of any sketchbook I've owned, I find myself drawing in stuff to fill the pages. Not an onerous task when the pages are 3x5", but it's an odd shift from how I work with my typical books. Just pencil so far, though I've been told that ink goes wonderfully on these pages.
Saturday, 13 December 2008
I can't recall laughing this much at filthy Star Trek songs in my life. . . .
Katherine Piro dressed up as the green alien babe from the pilot, Bret dressed up as Spock, special guest Model Coco Framboise was the sexiest Uhura EVER, and Dr Sketchy's photog Brynne was Nurse Chapel.
Time just flew -- how could I concentrate with bridge personnel giving birth to tribbles?
Next Sketchy's is January 12th. happens to be my birthday, so I'm doubly looking forward to whatever the Despot and Piro cook up!
Thursday, 11 December 2008
No. 1 The Accountants
No. 2 Bleed
No. 3 HellBreak
No. 4 Aeon of the Dead
No. 5 Tri-Boro Tales
No. 6 A Single Soul
No. 7 Angus Frump Kills Christmas
No. 8 Non-Exertus 12
No. 9 Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever
No. 10 Caztar
Heh -- copy and pasted the list from the Zuda blog; look, all linked!
The Accountants should take it -- it has the most page views (13229), favourites (136) and best average rating (4.5 stars). Bleed, falling to second place, has a significant deficit in page views, which is likely the better metric to use in this competition, to overcome. A little over 2 weeks left to go makes overtaking that many sets of eyes willing to reg and vote a nearly insurmountable task. HellBreak is a distant third in all stats, which disappoints me as it's grown on me with repeated viewings and I think the creators would have avoided making the same mistakes in the ongoing as the entry..
Fourth place Aeons of the Dead has more views and faves than HellBreak but fewer votes (duh!), which makes following these stats as evidence of anything a dubious pursuit.
With the other exception of Non-Exertus 12, the placings drop in order of page views. Non-Exertus 12's page views would pop it solidly into 3rd place ahead of HellBreak and Aeons, but I guess the 5000+ viewers didn't like what they saw enough to vote.
I'd really like to know if the compiled views count every page looked at by a viewer or number of viewers accessing the story. To clarify, an entry with 8000 views; did 8000 people read all or part of the 8 page entry or did 1000 people read all 8 pages and get counted once for each page they viewed?
I'm also curious about the competition images -- the tiny close-ups that link to the entry. Did most Zudaphiles see Angus Frump's lumpy head or cartoony caveman Caztar and just not bother to even look (they both have the fewest views).
I wish I kept notes from the previous Zuda competitions to see how the traditionally cartoony stuff plays out in views. My guess is that anything that doesn't have some sort of wow factor in that first tiny image isn't gonna get looked at and has lost the competition before it's even begun. I could probably Google up other blogs on the subject, but on this I'd prefer to develop my own data.
I wonder if the entrants have any input into the teaser image? If I were to enter, I think I'd try to exert some control over it.
Oh, a new strip started, I Rule the Night. It's a creepy little thing riffing on Batman/Robin bits by Kevin Colden. It looks promising.
Been doing some thinking about teaching drawing and the sorts of information usually given out in beginning lessons and art books. There's some writing to be done there as well as drawing examples to exploit.
More later. . . .
Friday, 5 December 2008
A good crowd and an interesting model again. I found out during the session that next Friday is cancelled due to tours at the school and I think I heard that that wraps up the Friday sessions until January --I'll have to check on that. I've found another place that's advertising Wednesday night life drawing a little closer, so that might allow me to continue trying to suck less at drawing through the holidays.
Last session I was rather disappointed with the paltry 15 gestures we did. Tonight we only did 10! Ugh. I need 10 just to get my rhythm started.
Yup -- that's, sadly, the best two of the lot. I weep real tears.
The prediliction toward 5 & 15 minute poses caught me off guard last time, so I decided I'd come expecting to do quick studies of interesting sections of the model instead of trying to get the whole in in the time alloted. One thing I've noticed is that I'm drawing much slower than the I expect, continually being caught by surprise by the pose ending. Hopefully that'll come back with more drawing as well.
Using vine charcoal to block in quick contours and areas of tone before using compressed charcoal over top. Never did that before, I like it, but I'm still finding my way with it.
Tonight's model had a tendancy to vvvveeeerrrrryyyy slllllooowwwwlllllyyyy move during the 15 minute poses, which kept altering my point-to-point and angles and I'm still too rusty to accomodate. Perhaps a few more sessions so I can strengthen that part of the memory to work through this.
Tried a quick head study; the block in was fine, but as I started placing features her head started turning toward me. . .
Thursday, 4 December 2008
1. Angus Frump Kills Christmas
3. The Accountants
5. Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever
6. Non-Exertus 12
7. Aeon of the Dead
9. Tri-Boro Tales
10 A Single Soul
How they currently stand:
2. The Accountants
4. Aeon of the Dead
5. Tri-Boro Tales
6. A Single Soul
7. Angus Frump Kills Christmas
8. Non-Exertus 12
9. Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever
Looks like I called 2 of the top three, but really was off compared to the zuda voters on what was the best strip this month. Wayyyyy off on on how I thought Caztar and Juliette would be taken, too.
A number of people are talking about how weak the competition is this month, but I'm finding it pretty par for the course so far. Odds are it'll be one of the top three winning come month's end and, even though I voted for Angus already, I'm pulling for Hellbreak or Accountants at this point.
Hitting life drawing again Friday night -- I'll try to pop up jpegs faster than last time!
Tuesday, 2 December 2008
A Single Soul
This is Furman's second entry in three months. Last time he did a fully painted entry, but, with A Single Soul he chose to use a pen and ink style reminiscent of Virgil Finlay and Charles Vess. He really busts his ass on the first page, though the gestures feel a little stiff it's nice to see realistic female figures in a strip. The lettering is a significant improvement from his previous entry (provided by co-plotter, Nancy Leslie), however the 3D rendered scrolls don't sit well on the page. It would have been better had Furman drawn the scrolls so they would be in a similar style to the actual artwork they are a part of.
The strip does a great deal of telling-not-showing in an info-dump of captions over nicely drawn trees and rocks, but there's a sudden and jarring scene transition to a spiral-tree and then into the spiral tree and another nude woman floating within its darkness. No captions on this page, even though we can assume the captions on the previous page were about the woman on this page. Essentially, page 2 became a wasted screen since the captions could easily have been added to page three. Page 4 has a birth scene, page 5 a rather pointless and unevenly drawn full screen image of the newly-born nude woman lounging against a rock. That brings us up to two wasted pages so far. The narrative finally starts on page 6; thewoman walks through some water -- there's a panel of the water rippling in her wake that might or might not be important since there seems to be some sort of symbol in it. The final panel is some sort of ragged skin or cloak with hands snagged on a branch. The drawing just isn't clear enough what it is we're looking at. Page 7, our naked woman is now wearing the ragged thing and she descends into a hole to some demon-infested underworld (no idea why she'd wanna go into another hole after just breaking out of one, but there ya go). A chicken-eating demon announces her arrival (we don't know where it is to announce this as this is the only time we see it in this strip), and another demon watches her walk toward some sort of building. Page 8 has the woman emerging from another hole! She's already reacting to a new demon attacking her from above and the entry concludes with her dispatching it.
I'm being pretty hard on this one, but it really ticked me off; comics are supposed to tell stories. With 2 wasted pages, a hallucinagenic and directionless narrative and poor storytelling the first strip, despite better draftsmanship than a few other entries, takes last place this month.
Aeon of the Dead
Not a great deal to write about this one: it's a zombie apocalypse story with a leather-clad, sword weilding babe in leather protagonist. The storytelling is far superior to the previous entry, but not spectacular on its own. The asian inspired art is uneven; better when there's reference (cars, gas station, road signs), horrible when the artist doesn't use it (the horse being the worst). It's a solo effort by Dean Hsieh, who does show a good deal of promise here, but needs to hone his drawing and painting skills and find a more original story to spend his time on.
Angus Frump Kills Christmas
Stevapalooza brings the funny and a really well developed style to my favourite entry this month. Some of the gags fall a little flat, but it's the most consistent entry. Really, you should just read it!
Looks like it's gonna be a serial killer strip. Creators Oysterboy and HarleyQuinn's offering has the feel of a high school project, albeit a pretty well done high school project. Apart from a complete drop in narrative clarity on pages 4 & 5, they do a pretty decent job at setting up scenes, locations and characters. The writing doesn't break any ground, or reveal characters particularly well nor does it really hook me into what's supposed to happen next. Much like Aeons above, I'd like to see what these people would be doing after more development.
I'm a big fan of European comics and 1970s Mad magazines so I may know what creative vein Poetzarelli is mining here while the larger North American audience may never have heard of Franquin or the others in the mix here. He does a nice job of setting up the gags and gave me a couple of smiles, but it didn't make me laugh. I don't know if this entry would be strong enough to have won any of the last few contests, but it's the second funniest strip this month, which means it's not likely to pull off a victory. Cute probably describes this best.
Radek Smektala and Janusz Ordon give us a very early Vertigo-like entry. Easily my second favourite entry this month and it's only its few shortcomings that keep me from putting my full support behind it and voting for it. As well drawn as it is, I found the colouring and vague backgrounds, when there were backgrounds, undermined the storytelling. A few other things struck me as I reread it; the knife used on page 4 was too large for a prison shiv, the establishing shot on page 5 was a missed opportunity where the Hell prison could really have been shown in al its horror, and showing how the characters on page 7 move about more clearly would have helped the storytelling (I'm guessing that the stone is morphing and the ground moves where the prison guards will it).
If Hellbreak does win, I hope the team drops the intensity and value of the colour and develops the backgrounds more.
Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever
Cedric Poulat produced this horror-comedy strip with a debt to Buffy, Clueless and other teen comedies. Visually it's reminiscent of Kyle Baker's colour work and the storytelling is serviceable, though Cedric struggles with his cartooning and anatomy at times. It could very well be that I'm not the target audience (even though I'm a huge fan of Joss Whedon), but the humour didn't get me, which is kinda the bar this sort of strip has to top to be succesful. It's an idea that has merit, but this one needs some work on the writing. I'd love to see what Poulat could do with this with another take or with a writing partner with stronger comedic chops.
Here's a good rule of thimb for all the comics artists out there: if a character is flying or being levitated do NOT crop any of the figure until you establish this to the reader, especially any of the top of the figure. It's just bad, bad storytelling. Writer/artist Spencer Platt needs to back off and show the action more. His panel compositions are so claustrophobic that the lettering often obscures too much of what little there is to see of the actual action. The lettering here is a real weakness too; the font is a rather dull san-serif and doesn't suit the art at all and the balloon placement often leaves much to be desired. The writing is essentially all plot and there's no real characterization, just types. You could argue that there's not much room in 8 pages, especially in 8 action packed pages to reveal character, but I do believe you should be able to give the reader something to latch onto on at least one of the protagonists. As it is, we get two rough-housing gamer dudz and a sexy-bitchy pilot girl. The drawing and colouring (by soupcan13) are stronger and could do very well in a future entry.
I dunno. I really want to like it; it has elements of The Tick and a number of other surreal strips I've liked over the years, the storytelling's fine, characterization nicely handled, nice touches of humour. It's really a strip you have to read, and it'd be one I'd follow if it continued, but it's just not as strong out of the gate as some of the others this month. How's that for wishy-washy reviewing! Enough already, go read the damn thing!
Four people worked on this strip, though Keith Miller and Chuck Collins were the lead creatives here. Sadly, the urban-anime style of this leaves me cold. The character art and background art don't mesh well at all. It's a nice experiment, but doesn't have a positive effect on the story. It reall does try to get an animated feel to the art; the colours are flat, and the figures seem to float above the backgrounds. Uneven drawing trips this approach, too. I really don't think slice-of-life strips work well in this sort of competitive environment as I believe that sort of narrative works better with a larger amount of character and environment material to absorb.
How I'm ranking them:
1. Angus Frump Kills Christmas
3. The Accountants
5. Juliette: Worst Vampire Ever
6. Non-Exertus 12
7. Aeon of the Dead
9. Tri-Boro Tales
10 A Single Soul
Monday, 1 December 2008
So, I'm posting these as the best of the lot, even though they're painful for me to look at. So much rust I have to shake off before I think I can get back to thinking about improving.